CLSA.TO vs. FCCQ.TO
CLSA.TO (Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF) and FCCQ.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. CLSA.TO is actively managed, while FCCQ.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, CLSA.TO returned 86.83% vs 30.55% for FCCQ.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSA.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FCCQ.TO.
Performance
CLSA.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSA.TO achieves a 33.52% return, which is significantly higher than FCCQ.TO's 5.82% return.
CLSA.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 33.52%
- 6M
- 35.17%
- 1Y
- 86.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCCQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 23.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
CLSA.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF | 33.52% | 57.14% |
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 5.82% | 31.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSA.TO and FCCQ.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between CLSA.TO and FCCQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSA.TO vs. FCCQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CLSA.TO
FCCQ.TO
CLSA.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLSA.TO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.15 | 1.37 | +0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.10 | 2.72 | +5.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.68 | 11.17 | +23.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLSA.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSA.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, smaller than the maximum FCCQ.TO drawdown of -35.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSA.TO and FCCQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSA.TO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.73% | -35.56% | +23.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | -11.29% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -3.41% | +3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -4.00% | +2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.74% | -0.23% |
Volatility
CLSA.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) have volatilities of 3.83% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSA.TO | FCCQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 3.93% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.63% | 12.12% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 14.75% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 13.73% | +2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 16.09% | +0.32% |
CLSA.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSA.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FCCQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSA.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
CLSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.73%, more than FCCQ.TO's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF | 9.73% | 7.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF | 1.48% | 1.44% | 1.85% | 2.41% | 2.33% | 1.92% | 2.14% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSA.TO and FCCQ.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCCQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCCQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CLSA.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton Funds and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CLSA.TO and 0.35% for FCCQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for CLSA.TO and FCCQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer