CLSA.TO vs. CFOU.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CLSA.TO (Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF) and CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLSA.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Brompton Funds, while CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. CLSA.TO is actively managed, while CFOU.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, CLSA.TO returned 72.56% vs 88.95% for CFOU.TO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSA.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CFOU.TO.

Performance

CLSA.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSA.TO achieves a 22.07% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return.

CLSA.TO

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 7.65%
• YTD: 22.07%
• 6M: 30.64%
• 1Y: 72.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CFOU.TO

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 9.71%
• YTD: 23.22%
• 6M: 34.47%
• 1Y: 88.95%
• 3Y*: 57.23%
• 5Y*: 28.45%
• 10Y*: 22.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSA.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	22.07%	56.35%
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF	23.22%	78.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSA.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025	0.70

The correlation between CLSA.TO and CFOU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CLSA.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSA.TO

CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CFOU.TO

CFOU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CFOU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CFOU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CFOU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CFOU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSA.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLSA.TO	CFOU.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.03	3.62	+1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.80	4.39	+1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.99	1.57	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.77	5.56	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.97	22.74	+6.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLSA.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.03, which is higher than the CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSA.TO and CFOU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLSA.TO	CFOU.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.03	3.62	+1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.33	0.33	+4.00

Drawdowns

CLSA.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSA.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.73%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSA.TO and CFOU.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSA.TO	CFOU.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.73%	-86.23%	+74.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.78%	-16.08%	+5.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.23%	+3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-22.46%	+21.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	3.93%	-1.42%

Volatility

CLSA.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) is 3.20%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that CLSA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLSA.TO	CFOU.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	8.18%	-4.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.39%	20.93%	-8.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.50%	24.70%	-10.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	27.56%	-11.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	33.85%	-17.31%

CLSA.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSA.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSA.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison

CLSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.64%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CFOU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF	0.00%	0.00%
CLSA.TO Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF	10.64%	7.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSA.TO and CFOU.TO in my portfolio?

CLSA.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSA.TO or CFOU.TO?

On fees, CLSA.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSA.TO or CFOU.TO?

CLSA.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

What is the main difference between CLSA.TO and CFOU.TO?

CLSA.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Brompton Funds and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CLSA.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.