PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOZ vs. PBTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOZ vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOZ achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than PBTP's 2.13% return.


CLOZ

1D
0.08%
1M
0.67%
YTD
2.62%
6M
3.25%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
10Y*

PBTP

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.17%
YTD
2.13%
6M
2.12%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOZ vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CLOZ
Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF
2.62%5.99%11.85%14.92%
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
2.13%5.98%4.72%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOZ and PBTP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2023

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOZ vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOZ
CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

PBTP
PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOZ vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOZPBTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.64

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

6.90

-5.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

24.29

-18.63

CLOZ vs. PBTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the PBTP Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOZ and PBTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOZPBTPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.98

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.77

1.30

+1.47

Drawdowns

CLOZ vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOZ drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, roughly equal to the maximum PBTP drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOZ and PBTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOZPBTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-5.44%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-0.66%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.32%

-1.03%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.04%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-0.75%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.19%

+0.98%

Volatility

CLOZ vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison

Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) has a higher volatility of 0.42% compared to Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) at 0.38%. This indicates that CLOZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOZPBTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

0.38%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

1.03%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

1.54%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.80%

2.85%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

2.64%

+1.16%

CLOZ vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOZ vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison

CLOZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than PBTP's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLOZ
Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF
7.38%7.63%9.09%8.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
3.10%3.82%2.59%2.36%5.33%3.12%1.25%2.12%2.33%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLOZ and PBTP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLOZ has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to PBTP (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOZ dropped -5.32% vs PBTP's -5.44%.

On 3-year performance, CLOZ leads with 10.65% vs 5.18% for PBTP. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CLOZ has performed better with a 10.65% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLOZ.

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.38%, compared with 3.10% for PBTP.

CLOZ is categorized as CLO, while PBTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Panagram and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLOZ and 0.07% for PBTP.

PBTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOZ and PBTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer