PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOZ vs. BANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLOZ vs. BANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and StoneCastle Financial Corp. (BANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLOZ vs. BANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
-1.92%5.99%11.85%14.92%
BANX
StoneCastle Financial Corp.
-10.30%15.64%27.68%11.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOZ achieves a -1.92% return, which is significantly higher than BANX's -10.30% return.


CLOZ

1D
0.31%
1M
0.39%
YTD
-1.92%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
10Y*

BANX

1D
1.44%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
-10.30%
6M
-7.20%
1Y
0.74%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOZ vs. BANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOZ
CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BANX
BANX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BANX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BANX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOZ vs. BANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and StoneCastle Financial Corp. (BANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOZBANXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

0.04

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

0.19

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.03

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

0.02

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.53

0.05

+3.48

CLOZ vs. BANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the BANX Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOZ and BANX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOZBANXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.04

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.51

0.25

+2.26

Correlation

The correlation between CLOZ and BANX is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLOZ vs. BANX - Dividend Comparison

CLOZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, less than BANX's 12.07% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
7.97%7.63%9.09%8.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BANX
StoneCastle Financial Corp.
12.07%10.54%9.53%12.11%9.74%5.64%8.16%6.82%7.88%7.45%7.81%9.26%

Drawdowns

CLOZ vs. BANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOZ drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum BANX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOZ and BANX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOZBANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-55.06%

+49.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-13.34%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-11.44%

+8.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-9.47%

+9.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

5.21%

-3.99%

Volatility

CLOZ vs. BANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) is 1.35%, while StoneCastle Financial Corp. (BANX) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that CLOZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLOZBANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

5.06%

-3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

12.25%

-9.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.48%

19.06%

-13.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.82%

20.83%

-17.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.82%

27.66%

-23.84%