CLOZ vs. ACLO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO).

CLOZ and ACLO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLOZ is an actively managed fund by Panagram. It was launched on Jan 23, 2023. ACLO is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on Nov 15, 2024.

Performance

CLOZ vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLOZ vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	-1.92%	5.99%	1.21%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	1.06%	5.32%	0.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOZ achieves a -1.92% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 1.06% return.

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: -1.92%
• 6M: -0.71%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: 9.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACLO

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOZ vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.

CLOZ

Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF

ACLO

TCW AAA CLO ETF

Return for Risk

CLOZ vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 47
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 41

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 98
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOZ vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOZ	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	4.59	-3.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	6.77	-5.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	2.40	-1.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	5.31	-4.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	32.12	-28.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLOZ vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 4.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOZ and ACLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOZ	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	4.59	-3.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.51	4.75	-2.24

Correlation

The correlation between CLOZ and ACLO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLOZ vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

CLOZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, more than ACLO's 4.84% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	7.97%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.84%	4.87%	0.59%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CLOZ vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOZ drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOZ and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOZ	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.32%	-1.01%	-4.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.90%	-0.91%	-2.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.15%	-0.07%	-3.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-0.05%	-0.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	0.17%	+1.05%

Volatility

CLOZ vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.39%. This indicates that CLOZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOZ	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	0.39%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	0.58%	+2.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.48%	1.14%	+4.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.82%	1.13%	+2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.82%	1.13%	+2.69%