CLOO vs. FCLO
CLOO (NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF) and FCLO (Fidelity CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FCLO.
Performance
CLOO vs. FCLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCLO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOO vs. FCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 1.10% |
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOO and FCLO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOO vs. FCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO) and Fidelity CLO ETF (FCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOO vs. FCLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOO drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum FCLO drawdown of -0.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOO and FCLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOO | FCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.58% | +0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.07% | +0.07% |
Volatility
CLOO vs. FCLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOO | FCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48% | 1.29% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.48% | 1.29% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.48% | 1.29% | -0.81% |
CLOO vs. FCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FCLO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOO vs. FCLO - Dividend Comparison
CLOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than FCLO's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 0.59% |
FCLO Fidelity CLO ETF | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOO and FCLO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLOO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLOO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FCLO.
FCLO has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.59% for CLOO.
They also come from different issuers: New York Life Investment Management and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CLOO and 0.45% for FCLO.
Find the right allocation for CLOO and FCLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer