CLOO vs. CLOI
CLOO (NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF) and CLOI (VanEck CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. CLOO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CLOI.
Performance
CLOO vs. CLOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOO vs. CLOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 1.10% |
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF | 1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOO and CLOI is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOO vs. CLOI — Risk / Return Rank
CLOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLOI
CLOO vs. CLOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF (CLOO) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLOO | CLOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 41.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOO vs. CLOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOO drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum CLOI drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOO and CLOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOO | CLOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -3.25% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.18% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility
CLOO vs. CLOI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOO | CLOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48% | 1.10% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.48% | 2.52% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.48% | 2.52% | -2.04% |
CLOO vs. CLOI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOI's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOO vs. CLOI - Dividend Comparison
CLOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than CLOI's 5.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF | 5.27% | 5.61% | 6.71% | 5.61% | 2.23% |
CLOO NYLI Investment Grade CLO ETF | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOO and CLOI have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLOO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLOO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CLOI.
CLOI has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 0.59% for CLOO.
They also come from different issuers: New York Life Investment Management and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CLOO and 0.36% for CLOI.
Find the right allocation for CLOO and CLOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer