PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOI vs. SMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOI vs. SMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOI achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than SMBS's 0.70% return.


CLOI

1D
0.00%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.06%
6M
2.58%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
10Y*

SMBS

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.82%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOI vs. SMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CLOI
VanEck CLO ETF
2.06%5.84%0.75%
SMBS
Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.70%8.15%-0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOI and SMBS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOI vs. SMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOI
CLOI Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CLOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOI Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SMBS
SMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOI vs. SMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOISMBSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.72

1.64

+3.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.43

2.42

+5.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.16

1.30

+0.86

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.95

2.41

+6.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

42.16

8.21

+33.95

CLOI vs. SMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOI Sharpe Ratio is 4.72, which is higher than the SMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOI and SMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOISMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72

1.64

+3.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.77

1.18

+1.59

Drawdowns

CLOI vs. SMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOI drawdown since its inception was -3.25%, roughly equal to the maximum SMBS drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOI and SMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOISMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-3.20%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.62%

-2.83%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.33%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.19%

-0.84%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

0.83%

-0.70%

Volatility

CLOI vs. SMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) is 0.14%, while Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that CLOI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOISMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

1.55%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.67%

3.03%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19%

4.15%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.56%

4.86%

-2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.56%

4.86%

-2.30%

CLOI vs. SMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SMBS's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOI vs. SMBS - Dividend Comparison

CLOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than SMBS's 5.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CLOI
VanEck CLO ETF
5.35%5.61%6.71%5.61%2.23%
SMBS
Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
5.17%4.83%0.50%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLOI and SMBS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMBS has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to CLOI (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOI dropped -3.25% vs SMBS's -3.20%.

On 1-year performance, SMBS leads with 6.78% vs 5.56% for CLOI. On fees, SMBS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, CLOI has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMBS has performed better with a 6.78% return vs 5.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMBS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CLOI.

CLOI has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 5.17% for SMBS.

CLOI is categorized as CLO, while SMBS is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CLOI and 0.03% for SMBS.

CLOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.72 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOI and SMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer