CLOI vs. DMBS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CLOI (VanEck CLO ETF) and DMBS (Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOI is a CLO fund actively managed by VanEck, while DMBS is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CLOI returned 6.97%/yr vs 4.65%/yr for DMBS. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DMBS.

Performance

CLOI vs. DMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOI achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than DMBS's 1.36% return.

CLOI

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 5.32%
• 3Y*: 6.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DMBS

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.14%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 6.07%
• 3Y*: 4.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOI vs. DMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	2.30%	5.84%	8.26%	6.43%
DMBS Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF	1.36%	8.54%	2.09%	1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOI and DMBS is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023	0.03

Return for Risk

CLOI vs. DMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOI

CLOI Risk / Return Rank: 98
CLOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CLOI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CLOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLOI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

DMBS

DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 45
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 46
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOI vs. DMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOI	DMBS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.67	1.47	+3.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.36	2.20	+5.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.15	1.27	+0.88
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.55	1.91	+6.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	40.48	6.28	+34.20

CLOI vs. DMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOI Sharpe Ratio is 4.67, which is higher than the DMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOI and DMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOI vs. DMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOI drawdown since its inception was -3.25%, smaller than the maximum DMBS drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOI and DMBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOI	DMBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.25%	-8.14%	+4.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.62%	-3.20%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.25%	-7.24%	+3.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	-0.75%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.19%	-1.70%	+1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	0.97%	-0.84%

Volatility

CLOI vs. DMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) is 0.23%, while Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that CLOI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOI	DMBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.23%	1.33%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.68%	3.18%	-2.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14%	4.15%	-3.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.54%	6.25%	-3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.54%	6.25%	-3.71%

CLOI vs. DMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DMBS's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOI vs. DMBS - Dividend Comparison

CLOI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than DMBS's 5.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	5.33%	5.61%	6.71%	5.61%	2.23%
DMBS Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF	5.07%	4.96%	4.97%	2.82%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOI and DMBS in my portfolio?

CLOI and DMBS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOI or DMBS?

DMBS has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to CLOI (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOI dropped -3.25% vs DMBS's -8.14%.

Which ETF is better, CLOI or DMBS?

On 3-year performance, CLOI leads with 6.97% vs 4.65% for DMBS. On fees, CLOI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, CLOI has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOI or DMBS?

Over the 3-year period, CLOI has performed better with a 6.97% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOI or DMBS?

CLOI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOI or DMBS?

CLOI has the higher dividend yield at 5.33%, compared with 5.07% for DMBS.

What is the main difference between CLOI and DMBS?

CLOI is categorized as CLO, while DMBS is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CLOI and 0.49% for DMBS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.