CLOD vs. USRD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CLOD (Themes Cloud Computing ETF) and USRD (Themes US R&D Champions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOD is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Cloud Technology Index, while USRD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US R&D Champions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CLOD returned -2.27% vs 14.85% for USRD. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CLOD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USRD.

Performance

CLOD vs. USRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Themes US R&D Champions ETF (USRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOD achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than USRD's 11.87% return.

CLOD

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: 2.61%
• 6M: 10.30%
• YTD: -0.40%
• 1Y: -2.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.71%

USRD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.25%
• 6M: 11.38%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 1Y: 14.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	$10.26K	$13.57K	$43.79K
USRD Themes US R&D Champions ETF	$1.97K	$8.97K	$6.57K

CLOD vs. USRD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	-0.40%	7.53%	21.03%	0.77%
USRD Themes US R&D Champions ETF	11.87%	12.44%	15.53%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD and USRD is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.80

The correlation between CLOD and USRD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

CLOD vs. USRD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLOD	USRD
Technology	83.5%	68.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	7.1%
Communication Services	5.9%	3.4%
Industrials	1.5%	4.4%
Financial Services	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.9%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	13.3%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CLOD vs. USRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLOD

CLOD Risk / Return Rank: 8
CLOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
CLOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CLOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CLOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CLOD Martin Ratio Rank: 9

USRD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLOD vs. USRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Themes US R&D Champions ETF (USRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOD	USRD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	0.62	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.09	0.98	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.12	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.16	0.83	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.33	2.23	-2.56

CLOD vs. USRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the USRD Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOD and USRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOD vs. USRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, which is greater than USRD's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and USRD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOD	USRD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.36%	-23.79%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.36%	-13.49%	-17.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.11%	-7.79%	-2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-3.87%	-4.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.28%	5.13%	+10.15%

Volatility

CLOD vs. USRD - Volatility Comparison

Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Themes US R&D Champions ETF (USRD) at 3.96%. This indicates that CLOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOD	USRD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	3.96%	+2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.32%	14.94%	+7.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.45%	18.13%	+8.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.50%	19.34%	+5.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.50%	19.34%	+5.16%

CLOD vs. USRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USRD's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOD vs. USRD - Dividend Comparison

CLOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while USRD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	1.47%	1.47%	0.00%
USRD Themes US R&D Champions ETF	0.38%	0.42%	2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOD and USRD in my portfolio?

CLOD and USRD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOD or USRD?

CLOD has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to USRD (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOD dropped -31.36% vs USRD's -23.79%.

Which ETF is better, CLOD or USRD?

On 1-year performance, USRD leads with 14.85% vs -2.27% for CLOD. On fees, USRD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USRD has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOD or USRD?

Over the 1-year period, USRD has performed better with a 14.85% return vs -2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOD or USRD?

USRD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CLOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOD or USRD?

CLOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.38% for USRD.

What is the main difference between CLOD and USRD?

CLOD is categorized as Technology Equities, while USRD is Large Cap Blend Equities. CLOD tracks Solactive Cloud Technology Index, while USRD tracks Solactive US R&D Champions Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CLOD and 0.29% for USRD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.