PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOD vs. NATO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLOD vs. NATO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLOD vs. NATO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CLOD
Themes Cloud Computing ETF
-20.84%7.53%5.40%
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
0.78%50.95%0.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOD achieves a -20.84% return, which is significantly lower than NATO's 0.78% return.


CLOD

1D
3.17%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-20.84%
6M
-26.88%
1Y
-8.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NATO

1D
3.75%
1M
-11.24%
YTD
0.78%
6M
-1.05%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOD vs. NATO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLOD and NATO have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

CLOD vs. NATO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOD
CLOD Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CLOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

NATO
NATO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOD vs. NATO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLODNATODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.32

1.53

-1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.28

2.14

-2.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.30

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

2.15

-2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.77

8.09

-8.85

CLOD vs. NATO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the NATO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOD and NATO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLODNATODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

1.53

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

1.56

-1.49

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD and NATO is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CLOD vs. NATO - Dividend Comparison

CLOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than NATO's 0.45% yield.


TTM20252024
CLOD
Themes Cloud Computing ETF
1.85%1.47%0.00%
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
0.45%0.45%0.08%

Drawdowns

CLOD vs. NATO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, which is greater than NATO's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and NATO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLODNATODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.36%

-15.99%

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.36%

-15.99%

-15.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.56%

-12.83%

-15.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-2.86%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.66%

4.26%

+7.40%

Volatility

CLOD vs. NATO - Volatility Comparison

Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) have volatilities of 8.33% and 8.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLODNATODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

8.45%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.12%

15.04%

+3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.53%

22.63%

+2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

21.75%

+1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.49%

21.75%

+1.74%