CLOD vs. IGM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CLOD (Themes Cloud Computing ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CLOD tracks the Solactive Cloud Technology Index while IGM tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CLOD returned -8.67% vs 47.83% for IGM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLOD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.

Performance

CLOD vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOD achieves a -8.39% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 22.65% return.

CLOD

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: -8.39%
• 6M: -9.76%
• 1Y: -8.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGM

• 1D: -3.56%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 22.65%
• 6M: 21.02%
• 1Y: 47.83%
• 3Y*: 35.67%
• 5Y*: 19.25%
• 10Y*: 24.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOD vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	-8.39%	7.53%	21.03%	0.77%
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	22.65%	26.76%	36.99%	2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD and IGM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.79

The correlation between CLOD and IGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CLOD vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLOD	IGM
Technology	81.5%	84.5%
Communication Services	8.4%	14.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	0.0%
Industrials	1.3%	0.3%
Financial Services	0.8%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CLOD vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOD

CLOD Risk / Return Rank: 6
CLOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CLOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6

IGM

IGM Risk / Return Rank: 61
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOD vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOD	IGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	2.11	-2.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	2.67	-2.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.36	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	2.92	-3.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.59	9.77	-10.36

CLOD vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOD and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOD vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and IGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOD	IGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.36%	-65.59%	+34.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.36%	-16.44%	-14.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.33%	-7.39%	-9.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.62%	-15.21%	+7.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.63%	4.91%	+9.72%

Volatility

CLOD vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) have volatilities of 11.59% and 11.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOD	IGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.59%	11.53%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.32%	18.67%	+3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.74%	22.76%	+2.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.54%	26.07%	-1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.54%	24.71%	-0.17%

CLOD vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOD vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

CLOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than IGM's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	1.60%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	0.14%	0.17%	0.22%	0.33%	0.66%	0.16%	0.32%	0.50%	0.57%	0.57%	0.90%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOD and IGM in my portfolio?

CLOD and IGM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOD or IGM?

CLOD has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to IGM (11.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOD dropped -31.36% vs IGM's -65.59%.

Which ETF is better, CLOD or IGM?

On 1-year performance, IGM leads with 47.83% vs -8.67% for CLOD. On fees, CLOD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOD or IGM?

Over the 1-year period, IGM has performed better with a 47.83% return vs -8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOD or IGM?

CLOD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOD or IGM?

CLOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.14% for IGM.

What is the main difference between CLOD and IGM?

CLOD tracks Solactive Cloud Technology Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CLOD and 0.39% for IGM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.