CLOC vs. PSQA

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CLOC (AAM Crescent CLO ETF) and PSQA (Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF) are both CLO funds. CLOC is actively managed, while PSQA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CLOC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for PSQA.

Performance

CLOC vs. PSQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC) and Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF (PSQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CLOC having a 2.73% return and PSQA slightly higher at 2.79%.

CLOC

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 2.28%
• YTD: 2.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSQA

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 2.43%
• YTD: 2.79%
• 1Y: 5.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOC vs. PSQA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF	2.73%	0.93%
PSQA Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF	2.79%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOC and PSQA is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

CLOC vs. PSQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PSQA

PSQA Risk / Return Rank: 93
PSQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PSQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PSQA Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PSQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PSQA Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOC vs. PSQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC) and Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF (PSQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOC	PSQA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.29	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.70	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.53	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.19	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	23.48	—

Drawdowns

CLOC vs. PSQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOC drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum PSQA drawdown of -1.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOC and PSQA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOC	PSQA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-1.25%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-0.10%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-0.16%	+0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLOC	PSQA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88%	2.45%	-1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.88%	2.35%	-1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.88%	2.35%	-1.47%

CLOC vs. PSQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PSQA's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOC vs. PSQA - Dividend Comparison

CLOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than PSQA's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF	4.20%	1.15%	0.00%
PSQA Palmer Square CLO Senior Debt ETF	4.12%	4.48%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOC and PSQA in my portfolio?

CLOC and PSQA have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLOC or PSQA?

On fees, PSQA is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOC or PSQA?

PSQA is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CLOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOC or PSQA?

CLOC has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 4.12% for PSQA.

What is the main difference between CLOC and PSQA?

They also come from different issuers: AAM and Palmer Square. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CLOC and 0.21% for PSQA.