CLOC vs. HSRT
CLOC (AAM Crescent CLO ETF) and HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. CLOC is actively managed, while HSRT is passively managed. CLOC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HSRT.
Performance
CLOC vs. HSRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLOC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSRT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOC vs. HSRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF | 2.34% | 0.93% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOC vs. HSRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC) and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLOC | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 6.09 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CLOC vs. HSRT - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOC | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.07% | — | — |
Volatility
CLOC vs. HSRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOC | HSRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.91% | — | — |
CLOC vs. HSRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HSRT's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOC vs. HSRT - Dividend Comparison
CLOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, while HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF | 3.67% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 1.29% | 6.37% | 3.98% | 2.67% | 2.23% | 2.88% | 3.50% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HSRT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSRT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CLOC.
CLOC has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.
They also come from different issuers: AAM and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for CLOC and 0.24% for HSRT.
Find the right allocation for CLOC and HSRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer