PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOC vs. BDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOC vs. BDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC) and AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOC achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than BDIV's 7.27% return.


CLOC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDIV

1D
0.04%
1M
1.48%
YTD
7.27%
6M
6.86%
1Y
20.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOC vs. BDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CLOC
AAM Crescent CLO ETF
2.34%0.93%
BDIV
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF
7.27%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOC and BDIV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOC vs. BDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOC

BDIV
BDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOC vs. BDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC) and AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLOC vs. BDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOCBDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.09

1.20

+4.90

Drawdowns

CLOC vs. BDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOC drawdown since its inception was -0.54%, smaller than the maximum BDIV drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOC and BDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOCBDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

-14.98%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.07%

-1.99%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

Volatility

CLOC vs. BDIV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOCBDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91%

9.69%

-8.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.91%

13.41%

-12.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.91%

13.41%

-12.50%

CLOC vs. BDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLOC and BDIV have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

CLOC vs. BDIV - Dividend Comparison

CLOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than BDIV's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BDIV
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF
1.59%1.14%0.62%
CLOC
AAM Crescent CLO ETF
3.67%1.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLOC and BDIV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLOC and BDIV have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

CLOC has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 1.59% for BDIV.

CLOC is categorized as CLO, while BDIV is Large Cap Value Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOC and BDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer