CLOB vs. CLOC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLOB (VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF) and CLOC (AAM Crescent CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOB charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CLOC.

Performance

CLOB vs. CLOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOB achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than CLOC's 2.34% return.

CLOB

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 6.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 6M: 2.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOB vs. CLOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	1.88%	1.38%
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF	2.34%	0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOB and CLOC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

CLOB vs. CLOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOB

CLOB Risk / Return Rank: 68
CLOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CLOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CLOB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CLOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CLOB Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOB vs. CLOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOB	CLOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.04	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOB	CLOC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	6.09	-4.83

Drawdowns

CLOB vs. CLOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOB drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, which is greater than CLOC's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOB and CLOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOB	CLOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.54%	-0.54%	-5.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	0.00%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.30%	-0.07%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLOB	CLOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.98%	0.91%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.53%	0.91%	+4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.53%	0.91%	+4.62%

CLOB vs. CLOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOB vs. CLOC - Dividend Comparison

CLOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than CLOC's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	6.42%	6.61%	1.65%
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF	3.67%	1.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOB and CLOC in my portfolio?

CLOB and CLOC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLOB or CLOC?

On fees, CLOB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOB or CLOC?

CLOB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CLOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOB or CLOC?

CLOB has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 3.67% for CLOC.

What is the main difference between CLOB and CLOC?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and AAM. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CLOB and 0.49% for CLOC.