PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOA vs. SEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOA vs. SEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CLOA having a 2.06% return and SEIX slightly higher at 2.09%.


CLOA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.06%
6M
2.51%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
10Y*

SEIX

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.33%
YTD
2.09%
6M
2.81%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
8.17%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOA vs. SEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
2.06%5.44%7.25%8.38%
SEIX
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF
2.09%5.10%8.42%10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOA and SEIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2023

0.09

The correlation between CLOA and SEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOA vs. SEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOA
CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIX
SEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOA vs. SEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOASEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.34

1.86

+1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

30.02

5.39

+24.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

150.47

21.57

+128.89

CLOA vs. SEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOA Sharpe Ratio is 7.45, which is higher than the SEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOA and SEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOASEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.45

3.79

+3.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.22

1.24

+3.98

Drawdowns

CLOA vs. SEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOA drawdown since its inception was -1.34%, smaller than the maximum SEIX drawdown of -17.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOA and SEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOASEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-17.51%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.18%

-1.13%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.13%

-3.01%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-0.87%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.28%

-0.24%

Volatility

CLOA vs. SEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) is 0.15%, while Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX) has a volatility of 0.35%. This indicates that CLOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOASEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.15%

0.35%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.48%

1.28%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71%

1.61%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.32%

2.93%

-1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.32%

4.34%

-3.02%

CLOA vs. SEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SEIX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOA vs. SEIX - Dividend Comparison

CLOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than SEIX's 7.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
4.96%5.35%6.01%5.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEIX
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF
7.25%7.52%8.09%8.74%5.76%4.16%3.75%3.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLOA and SEIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEIX has higher volatility (0.35%) compared to CLOA (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOA dropped -1.34% vs SEIX's -17.51%.

On 3-year performance, SEIX leads with 8.17% vs 6.74% for CLOA. On fees, CLOA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CLOA has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEIX has performed better with a 8.17% return vs 6.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLOA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for SEIX.

SEIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.25%, compared with 4.96% for CLOA.

CLOA is categorized as CLO, while SEIX is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CLOA and 0.57% for SEIX.

CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.45 vs 3.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOA and SEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer