CLOA vs. HYGH
CLOA (BlackRock AAA CLO ETF) and HYGH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOA is a CLO fund actively managed by BlackRock, while HYGH is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CLOA returned 6.62%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for HYGH. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for HYGH.
Performance
CLOA vs. HYGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOA achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than HYGH's 3.24% return.
CLOA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYGH
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 3.69%
- 1Y
- 8.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.50%
CLOA vs. HYGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOA BlackRock AAA CLO ETF | 2.15% | 5.44% | 7.25% | 8.38% |
HYGH iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF | 3.24% | 6.94% | 11.22% | 9.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOA and HYGH is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2023 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOA vs. HYGH — Risk / Return Rank
CLOA
HYGH
CLOA vs. HYGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLOA | HYGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +10.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.33 | 1.41 | +1.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 29.15 | 4.88 | +24.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 145.81 | 19.08 | +126.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOA vs. HYGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOA drawdown since its inception was -1.34%, smaller than the maximum HYGH drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOA and HYGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOA | HYGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -23.88% | +22.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.18% | -1.62% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.13% | -8.06% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -2.22% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 0.41% | -0.37% |
Volatility
CLOA vs. HYGH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) is 0.13%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that CLOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOA | HYGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.13% | 0.68% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.48% | 2.80% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70% | 3.66% | -2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.31% | 7.07% | -5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.31% | 8.34% | -7.03% |
CLOA vs. HYGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGH's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOA vs. HYGH - Dividend Comparison
CLOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than HYGH's 6.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOA BlackRock AAA CLO ETF | 4.95% | 5.35% | 6.01% | 5.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYGH iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF | 6.60% | 6.86% | 7.85% | 8.95% | 6.21% | 3.74% | 4.06% | 4.89% | 6.45% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOA and HYGH have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYGH has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to CLOA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOA dropped -1.34% vs HYGH's -23.88%.
On 3-year performance, HYGH leads with 9.63% vs 6.62% for CLOA. On fees, CLOA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CLOA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 6.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CLOA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HYGH.
HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 4.95% for CLOA.
CLOA is categorized as CLO, while HYGH is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CLOA and 0.53% for HYGH.
CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.39 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOA and HYGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer