CLO.L vs. INTL.L
CLO.L (Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc) and INTL.L (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - CLO.L tracks the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index while INTL.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CLO.L returned 5.16%/yr vs 26.46%/yr for INTL.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLO.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for INTL.L.
Performance
CLO.L vs. INTL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CLO.L is traded in USD, while INTL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INTL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLO.L achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than INTL.L's 35.63% return.
CLO.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTL.L
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- 6M
- 29.23%
- YTD
- 35.63%
- 1Y
- 58.21%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- —
CLO.L vs. INTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLO.L Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc | 6.24% | -6.11% | 5.66% | 44.70% | -40.70% | -13.65% |
INTL.L WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 35.63% | 23.14% | 11.68% | 56.56% | -42.06% | 4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLO.L and INTL.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CLO.L and INTL.L has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CLO.L vs. INTL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLO.L
INTL.L
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CLO.L
INTL.L
Communication Services
CLO.L
INTL.L
Real Estate
CLO.L
INTL.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
CLO.L
INTL.L
Healthcare
CLO.L
INTL.L
Basic Materials
CLO.L
-
INTL.L
-
Consumer Defensive
CLO.L
-
INTL.L
Energy
CLO.L
-
INTL.L
-
Financial Services
CLO.L
-
INTL.L
Industrials
CLO.L
-
INTL.L
Utilities
CLO.L
-
INTL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLO.L vs. INTL.L — Risk / Return Rank
CLO.L
INTL.L
CLO.L vs. INTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc (CLO.L) and WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLO.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.32 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 3.77 | -3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.43 | 10.74 | -10.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLO.L vs. INTL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLO.L drawdown since its inception was -53.57%, which is greater than INTL.L's maximum drawdown of -48.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLO.L and INTL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLO.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.57% | -48.41% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.63% | -15.38% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.15% | -31.15% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.40% | -9.85% | -13.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -14.47% | -19.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.85% | 5.40% | +6.45% |
Volatility
CLO.L vs. INTL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Cloud Computing UCITS ETF USD Acc (CLO.L) is 9.21%, while WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a volatility of 12.31%. This indicates that CLO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLO.L | INTL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.21% | 12.31% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.95% | 24.03% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.49% | 29.70% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.41% | 31.12% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.41% | 30.92% | -0.51% |
CLO.L vs. INTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLO.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than INTL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLO.L vs. INTL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLO.L nor INTL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLO.L and INTL.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INTL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INTL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CLO.L.
CLO.L tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CLO.L and 0.40% for INTL.L.
Find the right allocation for CLO.L and INTL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer