VRLA.PA vs. AENA.MC
VRLA.PA (Verallia) and AENA.MC (Aena SA) are both stocks. VRLA.PA operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while AENA.MC operates in Airports & Air Services (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, VRLA.PA returned -4.20%/yr vs 14.65%/yr for AENA.MC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VRLA.PA vs. AENA.MC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRLA.PA achieves a -8.48% return, which is significantly lower than AENA.MC's 6.05% return.
VRLA.PA
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- -8.48%
- 6M
- -12.73%
- 1Y
- -25.26%
- 3Y*
- -10.91%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- —
AENA.MC
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 23.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
VRLA.PA vs. AENA.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between VRLA.PA and AENA.MC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2019 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRLA.PA vs. AENA.MC — Risk / Return Rank
VRLA.PA
AENA.MC
VRLA.PA vs. AENA.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verallia (VRLA.PA) and Aena SA (AENA.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRLA.PA | AENA.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.06 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 0.28 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 0.59 | -1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRLA.PA | AENA.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 0.23 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.63 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.52 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
VRLA.PA vs. AENA.MC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRLA.PA drawdown since its inception was -60.59%, which is greater than AENA.MC's maximum drawdown of -48.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRLA.PA and AENA.MC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRLA.PA | AENA.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.59% | -48.39% | -12.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.31% | -18.14% | -28.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.59% | -18.14% | -42.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.59% | -33.30% | -27.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.76% | -12.32% | -34.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -12.31% | -9.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.20% | 8.57% | +14.63% |
Volatility
VRLA.PA vs. AENA.MC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Verallia (VRLA.PA) is 6.94%, while Aena SA (AENA.MC) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that VRLA.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AENA.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRLA.PA | AENA.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 8.08% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.94% | 16.91% | +6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.44% | 21.94% | +5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.28% | 23.04% | +7.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.08% | 26.60% | +6.48% |
Dividends
VRLA.PA vs. AENA.MC - Dividend Comparison
VRLA.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than AENA.MC's 3.62% yield.
Financials
VRLA.PA vs. AENA.MC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Verallia and Aena SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
VRLA.PA and AENA.MC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for VRLA.PA and AENA.MC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer