CLMVX vs. FPFIX
CLMVX (Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund) and FPFIX (FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, CLMVX returned 0.74%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for FPFIX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLMVX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for FPFIX.
Performance
CLMVX vs. FPFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLMVX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than FPFIX's -0.11% return.
CLMVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 7.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
FPFIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 4.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- —
CLMVX vs. FPFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMVX Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund | 0.66% | 11.95% | 5.30% | 7.57% | -17.82% | 5.44% | 9.25% | 6.33% |
FPFIX FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund | -0.11% | 6.87% | 5.28% | 8.11% | -2.82% | 1.77% | 4.71% | 3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLMVX and FPFIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between CLMVX and FPFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLMVX vs. FPFIX — Risk / Return Rank
CLMVX
FPFIX
CLMVX vs. FPFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund (CLMVX) and FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund (FPFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLMVX | FPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 1.95 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 5.70 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLMVX | FPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.67 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 1.52 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.76 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
CLMVX vs. FPFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLMVX drawdown since its inception was -22.15%, which is greater than FPFIX's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMVX and FPFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLMVX | FPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.15% | -4.11% | -18.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.20% | -2.10% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.64% | -2.10% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.15% | -4.11% | -18.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -1.51% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -0.59% | -3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.72% | +0.26% |
Volatility
CLMVX vs. FPFIX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund (CLMVX) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund (FPFIX) at 0.79%. This indicates that CLMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLMVX | FPFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 0.79% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | 1.75% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 2.45% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.74% | 2.32% | +4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.54% | 2.08% | +3.46% |
CLMVX vs. FPFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLMVX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FPFIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLMVX vs. FPFIX - Dividend Comparison
CLMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than FPFIX's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLMVX Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund | 4.95% | 5.63% | 5.88% | 6.64% | 6.89% | 4.43% | 6.05% | 4.36% | 4.51% | 7.85% | 4.52% | 4.86% |
FPFIX FPA Flexible Fixed Income Fund | 3.74% | 3.78% | 4.76% | 3.95% | 2.92% | 2.26% | 3.00% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLMVX and FPFIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLMVX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to FPFIX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLMVX dropped -22.15% vs FPFIX's -4.11%.
CLMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLMVX and FPFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer