PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLMT vs. HSBH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLMT vs. HSBH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (CLMT) and HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLMT achieves a 102.62% return, which is significantly higher than HSBH's 33.25% return.


CLMT

1D
-3.13%
1M
9.19%
6M
64.26%
YTD
102.62%
1Y
159.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
51.07%

HSBH

1D
-3.25%
1M
3.24%
6M
19.01%
YTD
33.25%
1Y
68.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
62.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$46.84M$48.20M$36.91M
$1.96M$1.40M$676.58K

CLMT vs. HSBH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CLMT
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.
102.62%108.06%
HSBH
HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF
33.25%39.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CLMT and HSBH is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLMT vs. HSBH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLMT
CLMT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

HSBH
HSBH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HSBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBH Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLMT vs. HSBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (CLMT) and HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLMTHSBHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.48

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.69

4.62

+6.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.35

16.91

+11.44

CLMT vs. HSBH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLMT Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the HSBH Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLMT and HSBH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLMT vs. HSBH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLMT drawdown since its inception was -61.87%, which is greater than HSBH's maximum drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMT and HSBH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLMTHSBHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.87%

-14.81%

-47.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.01%

-14.81%

-0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.89%

-4.97%

-3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.29%

-2.20%

-17.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

4.03%

+1.74%

Volatility

CLMT vs. HSBH - Volatility Comparison

Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (CLMT) has a higher volatility of 10.85% compared to HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH) at 7.55%. This indicates that CLMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLMTHSBHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.85%

7.55%

+3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.39%

20.06%

+12.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.23%

24.10%

+18.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.79%

22.92%

+36.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.79%

22.92%

+36.87%

Dividends

CLMT vs. HSBH - Dividend Comparison

CLMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLMT and HSBH have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLMT has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to HSBH (7.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLMT dropped -61.87% vs HSBH's -14.81%.

CLMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLMT and HSBH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer