PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLIP vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLIP vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLIP achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 108.52% return.


CLIP

1D
0.03%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.82%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
10Y*

TSMG

1D
2.19%
1M
30.51%
YTD
108.52%
6M
123.61%
1Y
295.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLIP vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.71%4.12%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
108.52%71.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CLIP and TSMG is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLIP vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLIP vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLIPTSMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+14.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+77.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

26.48

1.44

+25.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

142.41

8.44

+133.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,288.03

27.04

+1,260.99

CLIP vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLIP Sharpe Ratio is 17.97, which is higher than the TSMG Sharpe Ratio of 3.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLIP and TSMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLIP vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIP drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum TSMG drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIP and TSMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLIPTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-63.67%

+63.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-35.29%

+35.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-16.65%

+16.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

10.99%

-10.99%

Volatility

CLIP vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) is 0.07%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 29.04%. This indicates that CLIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLIPTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

29.04%

-28.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

59.04%

-58.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

75.62%

-75.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.44%

82.51%

-82.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.44%

82.51%

-82.07%

CLIP vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIP has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLIP vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

CLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than TSMG's 5.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.90%4.14%5.11%2.75%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
5.51%11.48%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLIP and TSMG have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMG has higher volatility (29.04%) compared to CLIP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLIP dropped -0.08% vs TSMG's -63.67%.

On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 295.67% vs 3.97% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 295.67% return vs 3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TSMG.

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 3.90% for CLIP.

CLIP is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TSMG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CLIP and 0.75% for TSMG.

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.97 vs 3.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLIP and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer