PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLIP vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLIP vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLIP vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
0.86%4.23%5.26%2.82%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.03%4.37%5.16%2.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLIP achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 1.03% return.


CLIP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOXX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.03%
6M
2.13%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLIP vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIP has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CLIP vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLIP vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLIPBOXXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

13.56

13.56

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

40.64

47.23

-6.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

11.02

10.69

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

74.34

120.87

-46.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

595.00

720.99

-125.99

CLIP vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLIP Sharpe Ratio is 13.56, which is comparable to the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 13.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLIP and BOXX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLIPBOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56

13.56

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.60

13.15

-2.55

Correlation

The correlation between CLIP and BOXX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLIP vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

CLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
4.03%4.14%5.11%2.75%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLIP vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIP drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum BOXX drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIP and BOXX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLIPBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.12%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.05%

-0.04%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.01%

0.00%

Volatility

CLIP vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) is 0.05%, while Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) has a volatility of 0.13%. This indicates that CLIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLIPBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

0.13%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

0.24%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30%

0.32%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.45%

0.37%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.45%

0.37%

+0.08%