PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLIM.L vs. V3GD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLIM.L vs. V3GD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (CLIM.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLIM.L is traded in GBP, while V3GD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the V3GD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLIM.L achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than V3GD.L's 1.02% return.


CLIM.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.07%
YTD
-0.77%
6M
-0.85%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
2.81%
5Y*
-1.57%
10Y*

V3GD.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.65%
YTD
1.02%
6M
0.11%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLIM.L vs. V3GD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLIM.L
Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
-0.77%5.06%-1.39%4.76%-13.57%-1.18%
V3GD.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing
1.02%-1.30%5.75%3.20%-2.95%5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CLIM.L and V3GD.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.56

The correlation between CLIM.L and V3GD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLIM.L vs. V3GD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIM.L
CLIM.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CLIM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

V3GD.L
V3GD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
V3GD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLIM.L vs. V3GD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (CLIM.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLIM.LV3GD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.15

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.04

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.78

2.55

-0.77

CLIM.L vs. V3GD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLIM.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the V3GD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLIM.L and V3GD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLIM.LV3GD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.85

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.25

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.26

-0.28

Drawdowns

CLIM.L vs. V3GD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIM.L drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, which is greater than V3GD.L's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIM.L and V3GD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLIM.LV3GD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.39%

-13.73%

-11.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.32%

-5.30%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.66%

-8.65%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-13.73%

-6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.66%

-2.60%

-14.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-5.26%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.17%

-0.24%

Volatility

CLIM.L vs. V3GD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (CLIM.L) is 1.62%, while Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing (V3GD.L) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that CLIM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V3GD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLIM.LV3GD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

1.73%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

5.11%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.10%

6.47%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.00%

8.63%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.53%

8.62%

-1.09%

CLIM.L vs. V3GD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than V3GD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CLIM.L vs. V3GD.L - Dividend Comparison

CLIM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while V3GD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CLIM.L
Lyxor Green Bond (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
V3GD.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged Distributing
4.37%4.45%4.35%4.05%2.44%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLIM.L and V3GD.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3GD.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3GD.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CLIM.L.

CLIM.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while V3GD.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp 0901 TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CLIM.L and 0.15% for V3GD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLIM.L and V3GD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer