PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CLILF vs. WDP.BR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

CLILF vs. WDP.BR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CLILF (CapitaLand Investment Limited) and WDP.BR (Warehouses De Pauw NV) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — CLILF in Real Estate - Services, WDP.BR in REIT - Industrial. Over the past 3 years, CLILF returned -5.11%/yr vs 2.62%/yr for WDP.BR. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CLILF vs. WDP.BR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and Warehouses De Pauw NV (WDP.BR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLILF is traded in USD, while WDP.BR is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WDP.BR values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLILF achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than WDP.BR's 4.18% return.

CLILF

1D
0.00%
1M
-12.44%
YTD
6.49%
6M
33.67%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
-5.11%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

WDP.BR

1D
1.82%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
4.18%
6M
11.27%
1Y
10.77%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
-3.66%
10Y*
18.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLILF vs. WDP.BR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited		6.49%-3.06%-1.09%-23.92%6.00%-1.96%
WDP.BR
Warehouses De Pauw NV		4.18%45.32%-35.39%13.10%-39.50%7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CLILF and WDP.BR is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CapitaLand Investment Limited

Warehouses De Pauw NV

Often compared with CLILF:
CLILF vs. 0012.HKCLILF vs. URW.PACLILF vs. SURYYCLILF vs. CURBCLILF vs. 0823.HKCLILF vs. CHC.AXCLILF vs. PSPSY
Often compared with WDP.BR:
WDP.BR vs. SPYWDP.BR vs. LLC.AXWDP.BR vs. SPYL.DEWDP.BR vs. EQIXWDP.BR vs. IBCZ.DEWDP.BR vs. IWDA.ASWDP.BR vs. ^GSPC

Return for Risk

CLILF vs. WDP.BR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CLILF
CLILF Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CLILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLILF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CLILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLILF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
WDP.BR
WDP.BR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
WDP.BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDP.BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDP.BR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WDP.BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDP.BR Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLILF vs. WDP.BR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and Warehouses De Pauw NV (WDP.BR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CLILFWDP.BRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.24
0.50

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.90
0.84

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.10

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

0.62

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.03

1.50

-0.47

CLILF vs. WDP.BR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLILF Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the WDP.BR Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLILF and WDP.BR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLILF vs. WDP.BR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLILF drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, which is greater than WDP.BR's maximum drawdown of -57.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLILF and WDP.BR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CLILFWDP.BRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.07%

-57.76%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.26%

-17.18%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.96%

-39.11%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-57.76%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-57.76%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.74%

-33.08%

-20.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.07%

-18.91%

-25.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.66%

7.15%

+7.51%

Volatility

CLILF vs. WDP.BR - Volatility Comparison

CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Warehouses De Pauw NV (WDP.BR) at 5.75%. This indicates that CLILF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDP.BR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CLILFWDP.BRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

5.75%

+4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.59%

16.70%

+37.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.76%

21.41%

+41.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.89%

27.93%

+51.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.89%

29.46%

+50.43%

Dividends

CLILF vs. WDP.BR - Dividend Comparison

CLILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than WDP.BR's 5.55% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited		3.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WDP.BR
Warehouses De Pauw NV		5.55%5.42%4.29%2.56%2.40%1.38%1.91%15.09%19.91%23.24%

Financials

CLILF vs. WDP.BR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CapitaLand Investment Limited and Warehouses De Pauw NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. CLILF values in SGD, WDP.BR values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions

CLILF and WDP.BR have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLILF and WDP.BR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer