CLILF vs. NVDA
CLILF (CapitaLand Investment Limited) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. CLILF operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, CLILF returned -5.11%/yr vs 71.13%/yr for NVDA. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CLILF vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLILF achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return.
CLILF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 33.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- -5.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -12.86%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
CLILF vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 6.49% | -3.06% | -1.09% | -23.92% | 6.00% | -1.96% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 29.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLILF and NVDA is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021 | -0.03 |
Fundamentals
CLILF:
$7.72B
NVDA:
$5.00T
CLILF:
SGD 0.05
NVDA:
$6.53
CLILF:
52.17
NVDA:
31.44
CLILF:
3.93
NVDA:
19.80
CLILF:
0.79
NVDA:
25.60
CLILF:
SGD 2.91B
NVDA:
$253.49B
CLILF:
SGD 2.22B
NVDA:
$187.95B
CLILF:
SGD 153.89M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLILF vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
CLILF
NVDA
CLILF vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLILF | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 2.07 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.03 | 4.94 | -3.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLILF vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLILF drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLILF and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLILF | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.07% | -89.72% | +23.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | -20.21% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.96% | -36.88% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.74% | -12.86% | -40.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.07% | -36.18% | -7.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.66% | 8.46% | +6.20% |
Volatility
CLILF vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) is 10.69%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that CLILF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLILF | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 13.26% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.59% | 26.67% | +27.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.76% | 35.00% | +27.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.89% | 51.76% | +28.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.89% | 49.84% | +30.05% |
Dividends
CLILF vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
CLILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLILF CapitaLand Investment Limited | 3.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
CLILF vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CapitaLand Investment Limited and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLILF vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
CLILF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
CLILF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
CLILF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLILF and NVDA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to CLILF (10.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLILF dropped -66.07% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLILF and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer