PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLILF vs. LMP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLILF vs. LMP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLILF is traded in USD, while LMP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LMP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLILF achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than LMP.L's 0.72% return.


CLILF

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
6.49%
6M
33.67%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
-5.11%
5Y*
10Y*

LMP.L

1D
2.32%
1M
4.31%
YTD
0.72%
6M
5.99%
1Y
-1.89%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLILF vs. LMP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
6.49%-3.06%-1.09%-23.92%6.00%-1.96%
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
0.72%20.96%-2.09%23.40%-43.33%9.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CLILF and LMP.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLILF:

$7.72B

LMP.L:

£4.32B

EPS

CLILF:

SGD 0.05

LMP.L:

£0.28

PE Ratio

CLILF:

52.17

LMP.L:

6.55

PS Ratio

CLILF:

3.93

LMP.L:

4.86

PB Ratio

CLILF:

0.79

LMP.L:

0.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLILF:

SGD 2.91B

LMP.L:

£867.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLILF:

SGD 2.22B

LMP.L:

£854.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLILF:

SGD 153.89M

LMP.L:

£828.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLILF vs. LMP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLILF
CLILF Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CLILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLILF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CLILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLILF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

LMP.L
LMP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LMP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LMP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLILF vs. LMP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLILFLMP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.99

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

-0.20

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.03

-0.37

+1.40

CLILF vs. LMP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLILF Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the LMP.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLILF and LMP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLILF vs. LMP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLILF drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, which is greater than LMP.L's maximum drawdown of -53.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLILF and LMP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLILFLMP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.07%

-53.28%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.26%

-16.83%

-12.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.96%

-22.97%

-22.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.74%

-16.91%

-36.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.07%

-13.56%

-30.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.66%

9.08%

+5.58%

Volatility

CLILF vs. LMP.L - Volatility Comparison

CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) at 5.91%. This indicates that CLILF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLILFLMP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

5.91%

+4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.59%

15.47%

+39.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.76%

19.56%

+43.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.89%

27.63%

+52.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.89%

27.79%

+52.10%

Dividends

CLILF vs. LMP.L - Dividend Comparison

CLILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than LMP.L's 6.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
3.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
6.71%6.54%6.16%5.07%5.48%3.12%3.71%3.55%4.60%4.09%4.73%3.35%

Financials

CLILF vs. LMP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CapitaLand Investment Limited and LondonMetric Property plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.15B
238.90M
(CLILF) Total Revenue
(LMP.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CLILF values in SGD, LMP.L values in GBP

CLILF vs. LMP.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CapitaLand Investment Limited and LondonMetric Property plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.6%
97.9%
Portfolio components
CLILF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

LMP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a gross profit of 233.80M and revenue of 238.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.9%.

CLILF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

LMP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported an operating income of 217.10M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 90.9%.

CLILF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.

LMP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LondonMetric Property plc reported a net income of 165.40M and revenue of 238.90M, resulting in a net margin of 69.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLILF and LMP.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLILF and LMP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer