PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLILF vs. EQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLILF vs. EQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and Equinix, Inc. (EQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLILF achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than EQIX's 39.25% return.


CLILF

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
6.49%
6M
33.67%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
-5.11%
5Y*
10Y*

EQIX

1D
1.21%
1M
0.15%
YTD
39.25%
6M
42.19%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
13.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLILF vs. EQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
6.49%-3.06%-1.09%-23.92%6.00%-1.96%
EQIX
Equinix, Inc.
39.25%-16.88%19.45%25.41%-21.13%4.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CLILF and EQIX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLILF:

$7.72B

EQIX:

$104.24B

EPS

CLILF:

SGD 0.05

EQIX:

$14.46

PE Ratio

CLILF:

52.17

EQIX:

73.01

PS Ratio

CLILF:

3.93

EQIX:

10.98

PB Ratio

CLILF:

0.79

EQIX:

7.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLILF:

SGD 2.91B

EQIX:

$9.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLILF:

SGD 2.22B

EQIX:

$4.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLILF:

SGD 153.89M

EQIX:

$3.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLILF vs. EQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLILF
CLILF Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CLILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLILF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CLILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLILF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EQIX
EQIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLILF vs. EQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) and Equinix, Inc. (EQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLILFEQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.18

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

1.09

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.03

1.96

-0.93

CLILF vs. EQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLILF Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the EQIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLILF and EQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLILF vs. EQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLILF drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, smaller than the maximum EQIX drawdown of -99.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLILF and EQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLILFEQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.07%

-99.44%

+33.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.26%

-18.93%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.96%

-24.59%

-21.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.74%

-4.86%

-48.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.07%

-52.61%

+8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.66%

10.45%

+4.21%

Volatility

CLILF vs. EQIX - Volatility Comparison

CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Equinix, Inc. (EQIX) at 5.55%. This indicates that CLILF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLILFEQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

5.55%

+5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.59%

16.97%

+37.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.76%

26.16%

+36.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.89%

27.66%

+52.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.89%

27.14%

+52.75%

Dividends

CLILF vs. EQIX - Dividend Comparison

CLILF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than EQIX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
3.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQIX
Equinix, Inc.
1.87%2.45%1.81%1.80%1.89%1.36%1.49%1.69%2.59%1.77%1.96%5.86%

Financials

CLILF vs. EQIX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CapitaLand Investment Limited and Equinix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.15B
2.44B
(CLILF) Total Revenue
(EQIX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CLILF values in SGD, EQIX values in USD

CLILF vs. EQIX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CapitaLand Investment Limited and Equinix, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
39.6%
51.5%
Portfolio components
CLILF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

EQIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.5%.

CLILF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

EQIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinix, Inc. reported an operating income of 577.00M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.6%.

CLILF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.

EQIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equinix, Inc. reported a net income of 415.00M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLILF and EQIX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLILF has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to EQIX (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLILF dropped -66.07% vs EQIX's -99.44%.

EQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLILF and EQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer