CLF.TO vs. CCRV
CLF.TO (iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF) and CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLF.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD, while CCRV is a Commodities fund tracking the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. CLF.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CCRV.
Performance
CLF.TO vs. CCRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CLF.TO is traded in CAD, while CCRV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CCRV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
CLF.TO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 2.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
CCRV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLF.TO vs. CCRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF.TO iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 1.00% | 3.36% | 4.82% | 4.58% | -3.98% | -1.27% | 0.27% |
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | -3.94% | 14.69% | 2.96% | 27.51% | 33.72% | 4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLF.TO and CCRV is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | -0.09 |
The correlation between CLF.TO and CCRV shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (3 years) to 0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLF.TO vs. CCRV — Risk / Return Rank
CLF.TO
CCRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLF.TO vs. CCRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) and iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLF.TO | CCRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLF.TO vs. CCRV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLF.TO | CCRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | — | — |
Volatility
CLF.TO vs. CCRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLF.TO | CCRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.99% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.36% | — | — |
CLF.TO vs. CCRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLF.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CCRV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLF.TO vs. CCRV - Dividend Comparison
CLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, while CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 7.26% | 33.27% | 26.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLF.TO iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 2.25% | 2.22% | 2.22% | 2.23% | 2.10% | 1.98% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.67% | 2.91% | 3.12% | 3.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLF.TO and CCRV have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLF.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLF.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CCRV.
CLF.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while CCRV is Commodities. CLF.TO tracks Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD, while CCRV tracks CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for CLF.TO and 0.40% for CCRV.
Find the right allocation for CLF.TO and CCRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer