CLDAX vs. PCGTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLDAX (Calvert Core Bond Fund) and PCGTX (PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, CLDAX returned 3.06%/yr vs 1.55%/yr for PCGTX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLDAX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for PCGTX.

Performance

CLDAX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLDAX achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 3.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDAX has outperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 3.06%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return.

CLDAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: -0.01%
• 1Y: 5.08%
• 3Y*: 3.71%
• 5Y*: -0.14%
• 10Y*: 3.06%

PCGTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 3.02%
• 6M: 3.30%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: 0.34%
• 10Y*: 1.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLDAX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	0.02%	7.27%	1.39%	5.04%	-13.48%	-2.30%	14.56%	20.77%	-5.73%	9.47%
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	3.02%	7.84%	0.98%	5.12%	-13.48%	-0.61%	5.75%	6.55%	0.17%	2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CLDAX and PCGTX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2005	0.72

The correlation between CLDAX and PCGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CLDAX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLDAX

CLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 19
CLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
CLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

PCGTX

PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 55
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLDAX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLDAX	PCGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.81	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	3.16	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.40	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	3.33	-1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.92	11.48	-6.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLDAX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDAX and PCGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLDAX	PCGTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	1.81	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.05	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.29	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.96	-0.14

Drawdowns

CLDAX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLDAX drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDAX and PCGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLDAX	PCGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.88%	-19.34%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.24%	-3.09%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.09%	-7.94%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.21%	-19.20%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.88%	-19.34%	+0.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.41%	-1.31%	-2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.92%	-1.85%	-2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	0.92%	+0.11%

Volatility

CLDAX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) is 1.50%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that CLDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLDAX	PCGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.50%	1.85%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.94%	4.40%	-1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.95%	5.67%	-1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.64%	7.16%	-1.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.81%	5.39%	+1.42%

CLDAX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLDAX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLDAX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

CLDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than PCGTX's 4.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund	4.23%	4.24%	4.16%	3.17%	1.80%	6.08%	5.22%	3.04%	3.63%	3.02%	7.02%	2.85%
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	4.48%	3.78%	5.36%	5.02%	3.67%	2.87%	3.23%	3.53%	3.34%	2.96%	2.71%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLDAX and PCGTX in my portfolio?

CLDAX and PCGTX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLDAX or PCGTX?

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to CLDAX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLDAX dropped -18.88% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.