PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLBAX vs. ABALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLBAX vs. ABALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class 529-A (CLBAX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CLBAX having a 9.46% return and ABALX slightly higher at 9.47%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CLBAX having a 10.05% annualized return and ABALX not far ahead at 10.07%.


CLBAX

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.85%
YTD
9.46%
6M
10.26%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
10.05%

ABALX

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.87%
YTD
9.47%
6M
10.29%
1Y
23.98%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLBAX vs. ABALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLBAX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class 529-A
9.46%18.43%14.96%13.61%-12.16%15.70%10.79%18.51%-3.43%14.64%
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
9.47%18.45%14.63%13.65%-12.13%15.75%10.85%18.60%-3.35%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CLBAX and ABALX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2002

1.00

The correlation between CLBAX and ABALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLBAX vs. ABALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLBAX
CLBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CLBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CLBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ABALX
ABALX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ABALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ABALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLBAX vs. ABALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class 529-A (CLBAX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLBAXABALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.53

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.49

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.72

15.74

-0.02

CLBAX vs. ABALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLBAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the ABALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLBAX and ABALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLBAXABALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.81

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.90

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.95

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.81

-0.12

Drawdowns

CLBAX vs. ABALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ABALX drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLBAX and ABALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLBAXABALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.25%

-40.20%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-7.03%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.68%

-10.68%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.79%

-18.76%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.33%

-22.34%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.46%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-3.85%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.55%

0.00%

Volatility

CLBAX vs. ABALX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds American Balanced Fund Class 529-A (CLBAX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX) have volatilities of 2.71% and 2.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLBAXABALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.71%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

6.82%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

8.73%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.49%

10.49%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

10.67%

0.00%

CLBAX vs. ABALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLBAX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ABALX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLBAX vs. ABALX - Dividend Comparison

CLBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, which matches ABALX's 7.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
7.58%8.27%6.87%2.05%2.30%4.30%4.35%3.49%5.49%4.72%4.24%5.60%
CLBAX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class 529-A
7.56%8.26%7.17%2.03%2.27%4.27%4.32%3.43%5.42%4.67%4.17%5.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, CLBAX and ABALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ABALX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to CLBAX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLBAX dropped -40.25% vs ABALX's -40.20%.

ABALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLBAX and ABALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer