CLB vs. BA
CLB (Core Laboratories NV) and BA (The Boeing Company) are both stocks. CLB operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while BA operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CLB returned -19.93%/yr vs 6.70%/yr for BA. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLB vs. BA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLB achieves a -26.48% return, which is significantly lower than BA's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CLB has underperformed BA with an annualized return of -19.93%, while BA has yielded a comparatively higher 6.70% annualized return.
CLB
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -17.23%
- YTD
- -26.48%
- 6M
- -28.96%
- 1Y
- -4.88%
- 3Y*
- -19.72%
- 5Y*
- -22.36%
- 10Y*
- -19.93%
BA
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 11.11%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -1.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.70%
CLB vs. BA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLB Core Laboratories NV | -26.48% | -7.12% | -1.76% | -12.72% | -8.97% | -15.73% | -29.05% | -34.35% | -44.49% | -6.83% |
BA The Boeing Company | 1.71% | 22.67% | -32.10% | 36.84% | -5.38% | -5.95% | -33.90% | 3.34% | 11.50% | 94.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLB and BA is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 1995 | 0.24 |
The correlation between CLB and BA shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLB:
$542.28M
BA:
$180.68B
CLB:
$0.67
BA:
$2.90
CLB:
17.67
BA:
76.11
CLB:
0.98
BA:
11.92
CLB:
1.05
BA:
1.87
CLB:
1.97
BA:
30.21
CLB:
$524.73M
BA:
$92.18B
CLB:
$73.89M
BA:
$4.43B
CLB:
$70.89M
BA:
$7.13B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLB vs. BA — Risk / Return Rank
CLB
BA
CLB vs. BA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Laboratories NV (CLB) and The Boeing Company (BA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLB | BA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.09 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 0.45 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 1.01 | -1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLB vs. BA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLB drawdown since its inception was -95.78%, which is greater than BA's maximum drawdown of -89.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLB and BA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLB | BA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.78% | -89.45% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.81% | -24.96% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.29% | -48.31% | -15.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.91% | -53.76% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.50% | -77.92% | -15.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.70% | -48.68% | -45.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.43% | -31.02% | -10.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.12% | 11.05% | +5.07% |
Volatility
CLB vs. BA - Volatility Comparison
Core Laboratories NV (CLB) has a higher volatility of 13.86% compared to The Boeing Company (BA) at 11.15%. This indicates that CLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLB | BA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.86% | 11.15% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.54% | 23.78% | +10.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.56% | 32.31% | +26.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.80% | 36.62% | +17.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.03% | 41.66% | +13.37% |
Dividends
CLB vs. BA - Dividend Comparison
CLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while BA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA The Boeing Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.96% | 2.52% | 2.12% | 1.93% | 2.80% | 2.52% |
CLB Core Laboratories NV | 0.34% | 0.25% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.20% | 0.18% | 1.06% | 5.84% | 3.69% | 2.01% | 1.83% | 2.02% |
Financials
CLB vs. BA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Core Laboratories NV and The Boeing Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLB vs. BA - Profitability Comparison
CLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Laboratories NV reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported a gross profit of 2.55B and revenue of 22.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
CLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Laboratories NV reported an operating income of 1.89M and revenue of 121.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
BA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported an operating income of 448.00M and revenue of 22.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.
CLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Laboratories NV reported a net income of -789.00K and revenue of 121.80M, resulting in a net margin of -0.7%.
BA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Boeing Company reported a net income of -4.00M and revenue of 22.22B, resulting in a net margin of -0.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLB and BA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLB has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to BA (11.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLB dropped -95.78% vs BA's -89.45%.
BA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLB and BA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer