CL2.F vs. LQQ.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA).
LQQ.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2006.
Performance
CL2.F vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CL2.F vs. LQQ.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL2.F CyberAgent, Inc. | 1.38% | 9.85% | 14.79% | -29.87% | -43.83% | 5.23% | 79.04% | -6.54% | 2.55% | 36.44% |
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | -10.77% | 14.16% | 57.02% | 112.33% | -59.20% | 71.22% | 74.17% | 83.28% | -3.57% | 48.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL2.F achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly higher than LQQ.PA's -10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CL2.F has underperformed LQQ.PA with an annualized return of 3.99%, while LQQ.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 29.73% annualized return.
CL2.F
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- -27.94%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- -1.32%
- 5Y*
- -13.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
LQQ.PA
- 1D
- 5.92%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -10.77%
- 6M
- -7.37%
- 1Y
- 30.50%
- 3Y*
- 34.50%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- 29.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL2.F vs. LQQ.PA — Risk / Return Rank
CL2.F
LQQ.PA
CL2.F vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CL2.F | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 0.77 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | 1.27 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.18 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 2.70 | -2.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.22 | 8.75 | -8.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CL2.F | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 0.77 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.41 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.75 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.63 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between CL2.F and LQQ.PA is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CL2.F vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison
CL2.F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while LQQ.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL2.F CyberAgent, Inc. | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CL2.F vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL2.F drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than LQQ.PA's maximum drawdown of -75.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL2.F and LQQ.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL2.F | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.87% | -75.86% | -24.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.79% | -24.34% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.62% | -61.21% | -12.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.62% | -61.21% | -12.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.41% | -17.00% | -82.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.22% | -15.84% | -65.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.51% | 6.75% | +12.76% |
Volatility
CL2.F vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison
CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F) has a higher volatility of 13.05% compared to Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) at 10.87%. This indicates that CL2.F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQQ.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CL2.F | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.05% | 10.87% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.10% | 23.30% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.76% | 39.22% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.80% | 39.75% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.32% | 38.80% | +1.52% |