CJP.NEO vs. XIT.TO
CJP.NEO (iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CJP.NEO is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index, while XIT.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CJP.NEO returned 16.37%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for XIT.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CJP.NEO charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XIT.TO.
Performance
CJP.NEO vs. XIT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CJP.NEO achieves a 17.05% return, which is significantly higher than XIT.TO's -7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CJP.NEO has underperformed XIT.TO with an annualized return of 16.37%, while XIT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.72% annualized return.
CJP.NEO
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 6M
- 17.74%
- 1Y
- 49.90%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 22.66%
- 10Y*
- 16.37%
XIT.TO
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 13.98%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 17.72%
CJP.NEO vs. XIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJP.NEO iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 17.05% | 30.67% | 26.74% | 35.03% | 3.67% | 18.19% | 0.18% | 13.12% | -17.35% | 21.33% |
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | -7.03% | 15.48% | 30.02% | 55.56% | -35.85% | 10.74% | 45.91% | 60.88% | 11.71% | 17.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CJP.NEO and XIT.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009 | 0.29 |
The correlation between CJP.NEO and XIT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CJP.NEO vs. XIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CJP.NEO
XIT.TO
CJP.NEO vs. XIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CJP.NEO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.06 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 0.18 | +4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.20 | 0.36 | +16.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CJP.NEO vs. XIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CJP.NEO drawdown since its inception was -38.36%, smaller than the maximum XIT.TO drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJP.NEO and XIT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CJP.NEO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.36% | -56.92% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -31.93% | +20.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.86% | -31.93% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.86% | -54.15% | +33.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.75% | -54.15% | +16.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -17.01% | +15.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -16.91% | +5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 15.98% | -13.06% |
Volatility
CJP.NEO vs. XIT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) is 5.03%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that CJP.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CJP.NEO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 10.65% | -5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.58% | 24.63% | -11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 31.61% | -13.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 29.43% | -11.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 28.56% | -8.97% |
CJP.NEO vs. XIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CJP.NEO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than XIT.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CJP.NEO vs. XIT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CJP.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJP.NEO iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.26% | 1.48% | 1.71% | 1.24% | 1.96% | 1.56% | 1.97% | 2.42% | 2.38% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.84% |
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CJP.NEO and XIT.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIT.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CJP.NEO.
CJP.NEO is categorized as Japan Equities, while XIT.TO is Technology Equities. CJP.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index, while XIT.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for CJP.NEO and 0.60% for XIT.TO.
Find the right allocation for CJP.NEO and XIT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer