PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CJP.NEO vs. OPPJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CJP.NEO vs. OPPJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) and WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CJP.NEO is traded in CAD, while OPPJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the OPPJ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CJP.NEO achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly lower than OPPJ's 27.76% return. Over the past 10 years, CJP.NEO has underperformed OPPJ with an annualized return of 16.15%, while OPPJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.21% annualized return.


CJP.NEO

1D
0.46%
1M
9.32%
YTD
19.29%
6M
23.23%
1Y
51.21%
3Y*
30.24%
5Y*
22.91%
10Y*
16.15%

OPPJ

1D
0.39%
1M
5.04%
YTD
27.76%
6M
32.45%
1Y
67.10%
3Y*
36.48%
5Y*
28.76%
10Y*
18.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CJP.NEO vs. OPPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CJP.NEO
iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
19.29%30.67%26.74%35.03%3.67%18.19%0.18%13.12%-17.35%21.33%
OPPJ
WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF
27.76%30.79%31.07%35.90%12.51%10.65%-4.85%12.43%-11.80%21.31%

Correlation

The correlation between CJP.NEO and OPPJ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013

0.68

The correlation between CJP.NEO and OPPJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CJP.NEO vs. OPPJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CJP.NEO
CJP.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CJP.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

OPPJ
OPPJ Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
OPPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
OPPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CJP.NEO vs. OPPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) and WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CJP.NEOOPPJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.57

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.68

7.11

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.78

24.42

-6.63

CJP.NEO vs. OPPJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CJP.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the OPPJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CJP.NEO and OPPJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CJP.NEOOPPJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

3.46

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

1.64

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.96

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.90

-0.45

Drawdowns

CJP.NEO vs. OPPJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CJP.NEO drawdown since its inception was -38.36%, which is greater than OPPJ's maximum drawdown of -32.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJP.NEO and OPPJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CJP.NEOOPPJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.36%

-32.91%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-9.48%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.86%

-15.57%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.86%

-15.57%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.75%

-32.91%

-4.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.04%

+3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.17%

-5.73%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.76%

+0.14%

Volatility

CJP.NEO vs. OPPJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) is 3.09%, while WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that CJP.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPPJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CJP.NEOOPPJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

5.13%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

15.42%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

19.52%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

17.61%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

19.10%

+0.51%

CJP.NEO vs. OPPJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CJP.NEO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than OPPJ's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

CJP.NEO vs. OPPJ - Dividend Comparison

CJP.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than OPPJ's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CJP.NEO
iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.24%1.48%1.71%1.24%1.96%1.56%1.97%2.42%2.38%1.48%0.97%0.84%
OPPJ
WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF
1.50%1.78%4.02%2.71%2.63%2.96%3.04%2.17%2.06%1.53%1.66%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


CJP.NEO and OPPJ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OPPJ is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OPPJ is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CJP.NEO.

CJP.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index, while OPPJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for CJP.NEO and 0.58% for OPPJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CJP.NEO and OPPJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer