CJP.NEO vs. IBIT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT).

CJP.NEO and IBIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CJP.NEO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE RAFI Japan Canadian Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 2007. IBIT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jan 5, 2024. Both CJP.NEO and IBIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CJP.NEO vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CJP.NEO vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CJP.NEO iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	9.43%	30.67%	19.38%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-21.19%	-10.70%	113.89%

Different Trading Currencies

CJP.NEO is traded in CAD, while IBIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBIT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CJP.NEO achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -21.57% return.

CJP.NEO

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -3.54%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 6M: 22.11%
• 1Y: 44.20%
• 3Y*: 31.16%
• 5Y*: 21.18%
• 10Y*: 15.12%

IBIT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: -21.57%
• 6M: -42.55%
• 1Y: -22.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CJP.NEO vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CJP.NEO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

CJP.NEO

iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

IBIT

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF

Return for Risk

CJP.NEO vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CJP.NEO

CJP.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 90
CJP.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CJP.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CJP.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CJP.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CJP.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 6
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CJP.NEO vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CJP.NEO	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	-0.51	+2.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	-0.48	+3.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.94	+0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	-0.41	+3.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.50	-0.87	+13.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CJP.NEO vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CJP.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CJP.NEO and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CJP.NEO	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	-0.51	+2.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.40	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between CJP.NEO and IBIT is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CJP.NEO vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

CJP.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CJP.NEO iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	1.35%	1.48%	1.71%	1.24%	1.96%	1.56%	1.97%	2.42%	2.38%	1.48%	0.97%	0.84%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CJP.NEO vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CJP.NEO drawdown since its inception was -38.36%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -50.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJP.NEO and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CJP.NEO	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.36%	-49.36%	+11.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.45%	-49.36%	+35.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.16%	-45.80%	+40.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.25%	-14.18%	+2.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	23.27%	-19.84%

Volatility

CJP.NEO vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) is 7.73%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.85%. This indicates that CJP.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CJP.NEO	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.73%	12.85%	-5.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.71%	36.37%	-21.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.42%	44.85%	-23.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.34%	50.57%	-32.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.04%	50.57%	-30.53%