CJ.TO vs. ATH.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CJ.TO or ATH.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between CJ.TO and ATH.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CJ.TO vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
CJ.TO:
-0.00
ATH.TO:
0.15
CJ.TO:
0.12
ATH.TO:
0.47
CJ.TO:
1.02
ATH.TO:
1.06
CJ.TO:
-0.04
ATH.TO:
0.07
CJ.TO:
-0.26
ATH.TO:
0.48
CJ.TO:
7.36%
ATH.TO:
10.45%
CJ.TO:
30.52%
ATH.TO:
41.23%
CJ.TO:
-97.53%
ATH.TO:
-99.44%
CJ.TO:
-42.28%
ATH.TO:
-72.00%
Fundamentals
CJ.TO:
CA$990.15M
ATH.TO:
CA$2.62B
CJ.TO:
CA$0.70
ATH.TO:
CA$0.92
CJ.TO:
8.81
ATH.TO:
5.66
CJ.TO:
5.59
ATH.TO:
0.20
CJ.TO:
1.97
ATH.TO:
1.86
CJ.TO:
1.12
ATH.TO:
1.52
CJ.TO:
CA$591.59M
ATH.TO:
CA$1.44B
CJ.TO:
CA$344.12M
ATH.TO:
CA$654.69M
CJ.TO:
CA$147.33M
ATH.TO:
CA$313.06M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CJ.TO achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly higher than ATH.TO's -2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CJ.TO has underperformed ATH.TO with an annualized return of -2.64%, while ATH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.
CJ.TO
-2.09%
1.16%
-2.97%
-0.05%
-4.42%
74.89%
-2.64%
ATH.TO
-2.25%
6.98%
-4.75%
6.11%
30.03%
107.64%
9.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CJ.TO vs. ATH.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CJ.TO
ATH.TO
CJ.TO vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
CJ.TO vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison
CJ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.78%, while ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJ.TO Cardinal Energy Ltd. | 11.78% | 11.11% | 11.46% | 4.99% | 0.00% | 3.66% | 5.77% | 17.79% | 8.25% | 3.96% | 9.56% | 5.27% |
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CJ.TO vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CJ.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, roughly equal to the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CJ.TO and ATH.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
CJ.TO vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) is 9.23%, while Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a volatility of 12.38%. This indicates that CJ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
CJ.TO vs. ATH.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cardinal Energy Ltd. and Athabasca Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CJ.TO vs. ATH.TO - Profitability Comparison
CJ.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported a gross profit of 94.43M and revenue of 150.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.6%.
ATH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 177.95M and revenue of 367.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.
CJ.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported an operating income of 34.95M and revenue of 150.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
ATH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 97.71M and revenue of 367.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
CJ.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cardinal Energy Ltd. reported a net income of 21.40M and revenue of 150.93M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.
ATH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a net income of 72.00M and revenue of 367.84M, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.