CISMX vs. FVLKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Fidelity Value Fund Class K (FVLKX).
CISMX is managed by Clarkston Funds. It was launched on Sep 15, 2015. FVLKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
CISMX vs. FVLKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CISMX vs. FVLKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | -4.68% | -8.37% | 4.49% | 6.41% | -0.40% | 7.94% | 17.42% | 23.98% | -7.25% | 12.84% |
FVLKX Fidelity Value Fund Class K | 0.43% | 11.37% | 14.64% | 19.65% | -8.91% | 35.38% | 9.41% | 31.92% | -17.56% | 14.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CISMX achieves a -4.68% return, which is significantly lower than FVLKX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CISMX has underperformed FVLKX with an annualized return of 5.84%, while FVLKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.23% annualized return.
CISMX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -8.24%
- YTD
- -4.68%
- 6M
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- -7.11%
- 3Y*
- -0.97%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
FVLKX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- 18.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CISMX vs. FVLKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CISMX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FVLKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CISMX vs. FVLKX — Risk / Return Rank
CISMX
FVLKX
CISMX vs. FVLKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) and Fidelity Value Fund Class K (FVLKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CISMX | FVLKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | 0.85 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | 1.33 | -1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.18 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 1.06 | -1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | 4.37 | -6.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CISMX | FVLKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | 0.85 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.43 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.04 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.04 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between CISMX and FVLKX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CISMX vs. FVLKX - Dividend Comparison
CISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than FVLKX's 9.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CISMX Clarkston Partners Fund | 4.88% | 4.65% | 1.05% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 0.81% | 3.73% | 3.79% | 7.15% | 1.30% | 1.17% | 0.09% |
FVLKX Fidelity Value Fund Class K | 9.99% | 10.03% | 20.95% | 3.80% | 7.16% | 9.87% | 1.06% | 3.43% | 16.38% | 3.37% | 1.36% | 11.10% |
Drawdowns
CISMX vs. FVLKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CISMX drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum FVLKX drawdown of -90.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CISMX and FVLKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CISMX | FVLKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -90.17% | +56.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.26% | -14.99% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.19% | -31.39% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | -90.17% | +56.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.41% | -9.86% | -8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -9.52% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 3.65% | +1.02% |
Volatility
CISMX vs. FVLKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Clarkston Partners Fund (CISMX) is 4.82%, while Fidelity Value Fund Class K (FVLKX) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that CISMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVLKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CISMX | FVLKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 5.35% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 11.76% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.82% | 21.63% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 23.01% | -5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 288.99% | -270.78% |