CIPSX vs. SSCPX
CIPSX (Champlain Small Company Fund) and SSCPX (Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CIPSX returned 7.47%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for SSCPX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIPSX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for SSCPX.
Performance
CIPSX vs. SSCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIPSX achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than SSCPX's 25.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CIPSX has underperformed SSCPX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while SSCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.
CIPSX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- -18.68%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- -1.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
SSCPX
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- YTD
- 25.40%
- 6M
- 22.02%
- 1Y
- 36.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 11.94%
CIPSX vs. SSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPSX Champlain Small Company Fund | 4.39% | -22.88% | 23.09% | 14.01% | -20.83% | 12.37% | 24.14% | 25.02% | -3.35% | 10.56% |
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | 25.40% | 6.41% | 10.79% | 15.16% | -17.56% | 24.53% | 25.39% | 23.71% | -16.14% | 15.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIPSX and SSCPX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2004 | 0.92 |
The correlation between CIPSX and SSCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIPSX vs. SSCPX — Risk / Return Rank
CIPSX
SSCPX
CIPSX vs. SSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Champlain Small Company Fund (CIPSX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIPSX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.32 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.38 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 11.48 | -12.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIPSX vs. SSCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIPSX drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, smaller than the maximum SSCPX drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIPSX and SSCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIPSX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.42% | -53.65% | +7.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.56% | -11.54% | -20.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.27% | -27.78% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.62% | -27.78% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.09% | -43.59% | +7.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.58% | -1.38% | -21.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.49% | -10.23% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.38% | 3.39% | +13.99% |
Volatility
CIPSX vs. SSCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Champlain Small Company Fund (CIPSX) is 5.06%, while Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that CIPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIPSX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 6.42% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 15.22% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.21% | 20.30% | +5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 22.23% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 23.02% | -1.20% |
CIPSX vs. SSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIPSX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCPX's 1.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIPSX vs. SSCPX - Dividend Comparison
CIPSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIPSX Champlain Small Company Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.74% | 6.39% | 0.36% | 4.45% | 6.11% | 7.96% | 13.29% | 9.78% | 2.72% | 2.67% |
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | 7.19% | 9.02% | 11.37% | 0.00% | 10.18% | 24.67% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 17.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 58.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIPSX and SSCPX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSCPX has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to CIPSX (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIPSX dropped -46.42% vs SSCPX's -53.65%.
SSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIPSX and SSCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer