PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CION vs. CLOZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CION vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CION Investment Corporation (CION) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CION achieves a -23.03% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 2.78% return.


CION

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.55%
6M
-22.46%
YTD
-23.03%
1Y
-18.79%
3Y*
-0.08%
5Y*
10Y*

CLOZ

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.19%
6M
2.32%
YTD
2.78%
1Y
5.83%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CION vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CION
CION Investment Corporation
-23.03%-2.26%14.82%22.82%
CLOZ
Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF
2.78%5.99%11.85%14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CION and CLOZ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2023

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CION vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CION
CION Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CION Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CION Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CION Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CION Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CION Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOZ
CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CION vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CION Investment Corporation (CION) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIONCLOZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.43

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

1.50

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

4.98

-6.06

CION vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CION Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CION and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CION vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CION drawdown since its inception was -45.39%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CION and CLOZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIONCLOZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.39%

-5.32%

-40.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.39%

-3.90%

-29.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.62%

-5.32%

-32.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.66%

-0.23%

-31.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.45%

-0.38%

-15.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.47%

1.17%

+16.30%

Volatility

CION vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

CION Investment Corporation (CION) has a higher volatility of 12.79% compared to Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) at 0.76%. This indicates that CION's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIONCLOZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.79%

0.76%

+12.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.34%

3.20%

+22.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.89%

3.47%

+26.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.03%

3.77%

+26.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.03%

3.77%

+26.26%

Dividends

CION vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

CION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.91%, more than CLOZ's 7.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CION
CION Investment Corporation
27.91%14.89%13.33%14.24%14.87%3.52%
CLOZ
Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF
7.33%7.63%9.09%8.81%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CION and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CION has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to CLOZ (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CION dropped -45.39% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

CLOZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CION and CLOZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer