CINT.TO vs. KNGX.TO
CINT.TO (CIBC International Equity ETF) and KNGX.TO (Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF) are both International Equity funds. CINT.TO is actively managed, while KNGX.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, CINT.TO returned 7.26% vs 34.42% for KNGX.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CINT.TO vs. KNGX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CINT.TO achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than KNGX.TO's 12.80% return.
CINT.TO
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 7.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- —
KNGX.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- YTD
- 12.80%
- 1Y
- 34.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CINT.TO vs. KNGX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CINT.TO CIBC International Equity ETF | 5.69% | 2.86% | -2.29% |
KNGX.TO Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF | 12.80% | 35.23% | -5.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CINT.TO and KNGX.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CINT.TO and KNGX.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CINT.TO vs. KNGX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CINT.TO
KNGX.TO
CINT.TO vs. KNGX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC International Equity ETF (CINT.TO) and Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CINT.TO | KNGX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.46 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 5.51 | -4.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 16.06 | -14.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CINT.TO vs. KNGX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CINT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.69%, which is greater than KNGX.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CINT.TO and KNGX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CINT.TO | KNGX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.69% | -13.51% | -16.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.30% | -6.27% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -1.03% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -2.33% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 2.15% | +1.87% |
Volatility
CINT.TO vs. KNGX.TO - Volatility Comparison
CIBC International Equity ETF (CINT.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGX.TO) at 2.88%. This indicates that CINT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CINT.TO | KNGX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 2.88% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | 10.46% | +5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 13.61% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 14.97% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 14.97% | -0.23% |
Dividends
CINT.TO vs. KNGX.TO - Dividend Comparison
CINT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than KNGX.TO's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CINT.TO CIBC International Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.01% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.86% |
KNGX.TO Brompton International Cash Flow Kings ETF | 2.24% | 2.16% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CINT.TO and KNGX.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CIBC and Brompton.
Find the right allocation for CINT.TO and KNGX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer