CIND.L vs. SGLN.L
CIND.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - CIND.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while SGLN.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CIND.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 13.41%/yr for SGLN.L. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CIND.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CIND.L is traded in USD, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIND.L achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's 2.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CIND.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 12.77%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return.
CIND.L
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
SGLN.L
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 4.91%
- 1Y
- 32.35%
- 3Y*
- 31.17%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
CIND.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIND.L iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc | 5.75% | 14.46% | 14.71% | 15.66% | -7.56% | 20.97% | 8.76% | 24.22% | -4.90% | 27.62% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.93% | 65.25% | 26.06% | 12.89% | -0.12% | -3.46% | 23.28% | 19.23% | -1.55% | 11.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIND.L and SGLN.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2012 | -0.04 |
The correlation between CIND.L and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIND.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
CIND.L
SGLN.L
CIND.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIND.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 1.84 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.13 | 4.78 | +3.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIND.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.33 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.07 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.84 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.46 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
CIND.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIND.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIND.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIND.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.68% | -45.21% | +8.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -17.50% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.44% | -17.50% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.90% | -21.27% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.68% | -21.27% | -15.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -16.47% | +15.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -19.80% | +16.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 6.75% | -4.14% |
Volatility
CIND.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) is 3.18%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that CIND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIND.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 5.66% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 21.01% | -11.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 24.25% | -12.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 17.51% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 15.86% | +0.12% |
Dividends
CIND.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIND.L nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIND.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIND.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SGLN.L is Precious Metals. CIND.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price.
Find the right allocation for CIND.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer