CIND.L vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
CIND.L and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIND.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. Both CIND.L and SCHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CIND.L or SCHD.
Key characteristics
| CIND.L | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.14% | 17.07% |
| 1Y Return | 30.15% | 29.98% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.45% | 6.85% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.30% | 12.79% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.35% | 11.62% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.61 | 2.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.69 | 3.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.48 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.11 | 2.92 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.14 | 14.57 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.98% | 2.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.83% | 11.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.68% | -33.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.52% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIND.L and SCHD is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CIND.L vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CIND.L achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 17.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CIND.L having a 11.35% annualized return and SCHD not far ahead at 11.62%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIND.L vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIND.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CIND.L vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CIND.L vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
CIND.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIND.L iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.38% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
CIND.L vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIND.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIND.L and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CIND.L vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.51%. This indicates that CIND.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.