CIND.L vs. FLQA.L
CIND.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc) and FLQA.L (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CIND.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while FLQA.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Linked FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index - Net Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CIND.L returned 9.93%/yr vs 12.23%/yr for FLQA.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIND.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLQA.L.
Performance
CIND.L vs. FLQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIND.L achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than FLQA.L's 30.17% return.
CIND.L
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 19.43%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
FLQA.L
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -11.56%
- 6M
- 22.63%
- YTD
- 30.17%
- 1Y
- 48.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- —
CIND.L vs. FLQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIND.L iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc | 9.11% | 14.46% | 14.71% | 15.66% | -7.56% | 20.97% | 8.76% | 24.22% | -11.88% |
FLQA.L Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 30.17% | 29.84% | 7.76% | 12.02% | -12.93% | 4.57% | 6.71% | 9.75% | -5.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIND.L and FLQA.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.56 |
The correlation between CIND.L and FLQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIND.L vs. FLQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CIND.L
FLQA.L
CIND.L vs. FLQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIND.L | FLQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.37 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.45 | 10.76 | -3.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIND.L vs. FLQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIND.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, which is greater than FLQA.L's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIND.L and FLQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIND.L | FLQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.68% | -29.21% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -14.19% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.44% | -22.19% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.90% | -25.38% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -14.19% | +13.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -7.22% | +3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 4.45% | -1.85% |
Volatility
CIND.L vs. FLQA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) is 2.28%, while Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLQA.L) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that CIND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIND.L | FLQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 10.89% | -8.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 23.07% | -13.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 25.18% | -12.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 17.75% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 18.53% | -2.60% |
CIND.L vs. FLQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIND.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQA.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIND.L vs. FLQA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIND.L nor FLQA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIND.L and FLQA.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLQA.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLQA.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CIND.L.
CIND.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLQA.L is Asia Pacific Equities. CIND.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FLQA.L tracks Linked FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index - Net Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CIND.L and 0.14% for FLQA.L.
Find the right allocation for CIND.L and FLQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer