CIND.L vs. FEXD.L
CIND.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc) and FEXD.L (First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and First Trust respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CIND.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for FEXD.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIND.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FEXD.L.
Performance
CIND.L vs. FEXD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CIND.L is traded in USD, while FEXD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FEXD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIND.L achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than FEXD.L's 13.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CIND.L has outperformed FEXD.L with an annualized return of 12.77%, while FEXD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.67% annualized return.
CIND.L
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
FEXD.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 15.32%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
CIND.L vs. FEXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIND.L iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc | 5.75% | 14.46% | 14.71% | 15.66% | -7.56% | 20.97% | 8.76% | 24.22% | -4.90% | 27.62% |
FEXD.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B | 13.91% | 14.59% | 15.47% | 12.65% | -13.37% | 26.02% | 12.81% | 25.76% | -12.54% | 20.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIND.L and FEXD.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2015 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CIND.L and FEXD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIND.L vs. FEXD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CIND.L
FEXD.L
CIND.L vs. FEXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIND.L | FEXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.53 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 7.17 | -4.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.13 | 25.28 | -17.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIND.L | FEXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 3.09 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.68 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.79 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.68 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
CIND.L vs. FEXD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIND.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, smaller than the maximum FEXD.L drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIND.L and FEXD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIND.L | FEXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.68% | -39.16% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -5.43% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.44% | -20.26% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.90% | -21.85% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.68% | -39.16% | +2.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | 0.00% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -5.26% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 3.34% | -0.73% |
Volatility
CIND.L vs. FEXD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) is 3.18%, while First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that CIND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIND.L | FEXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 4.05% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 9.33% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 12.65% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 18.17% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 19.69% | -3.71% |
CIND.L vs. FEXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIND.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FEXD.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIND.L vs. FEXD.L - Dividend Comparison
CIND.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIND.L iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEXD.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIND.L and FEXD.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIND.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIND.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEXD.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CIND.L and 0.75% for FEXD.L.
Find the right allocation for CIND.L and FEXD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer