CIND.L vs. DGRP.L
CIND.L (iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc) and DGRP.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CIND.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while DGRP.L tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CIND.L returned 9.37%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for DGRP.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.33% expense ratio.
Performance
CIND.L vs. DGRP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CIND.L is traded in USD, while DGRP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DGRP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIND.L achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than DGRP.L's 6.30% return.
CIND.L
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 21.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
DGRP.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- —
CIND.L vs. DGRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIND.L iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc | 5.75% | 14.46% | 14.71% | 15.66% | -7.56% | 20.97% | 8.76% | 24.22% | -4.90% | 27.62% |
DGRP.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 6.30% | 13.39% | 18.19% | 18.17% | -8.26% | 25.51% | 13.64% | 30.59% | -6.72% | 26.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIND.L and DGRP.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CIND.L and DGRP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
CIND.L vs. DGRP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIND.L
DGRP.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CIND.L
DGRP.L
Technology
CIND.L
DGRP.L
Industrials
CIND.L
DGRP.L
Healthcare
CIND.L
DGRP.L
Consumer Cyclical
CIND.L
DGRP.L
Consumer Defensive
CIND.L
DGRP.L
Basic Materials
CIND.L
DGRP.L
Energy
CIND.L
DGRP.L
Communication Services
CIND.L
DGRP.L
Real Estate
CIND.L
-
DGRP.L
-
Utilities
CIND.L
-
DGRP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIND.L vs. DGRP.L — Risk / Return Rank
CIND.L
DGRP.L
CIND.L vs. DGRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (DGRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIND.L | DGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.58 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.13 | 10.90 | -2.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIND.L | DGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.18 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.86 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.97 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
CIND.L vs. DGRP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIND.L drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, which is greater than DGRP.L's maximum drawdown of -31.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIND.L and DGRP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIND.L | DGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.68% | -31.11% | -5.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -7.83% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.44% | -16.51% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.90% | -18.44% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.22% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -3.59% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 1.86% | +0.75% |
Volatility
CIND.L vs. DGRP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc (CIND.L) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (DGRP.L) at 1.80%. This indicates that CIND.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIND.L | DGRP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 1.80% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 6.71% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 9.32% | +2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 13.61% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 14.86% | +1.12% |
CIND.L vs. DGRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CIND.L and DGRP.L have an expense ratio of 0.33%.
Dividends
CIND.L vs. DGRP.L - Dividend Comparison
CIND.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIND.L iShares VII plc - iShares Dow Jones Indust Avg ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRP.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD | 1.01% | 1.10% | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.34% | 2.74% | 2.32% | 1.90% | 1.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIND.L and DGRP.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.33% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIND.L and DGRP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.33% per year.
CIND.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while DGRP.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree.
Find the right allocation for CIND.L and DGRP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer