PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CILGX vs. VIHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CILGX vs. VIHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clarkston Fund (CILGX) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CILGX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than VIHAX's 17.32% return.


CILGX

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.40%
6M
2.40%
YTD
3.60%
1Y
13.59%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.26%

VIHAX

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.34%
6M
10.32%
YTD
17.32%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
11.24%
ALL TIME*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CILGX vs. VIHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CILGX
Clarkston Fund
3.60%8.29%6.79%17.86%-8.60%10.90%16.93%27.46%-8.39%9.33%
VIHAX
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund Admiral Shares
17.32%38.01%6.96%16.81%-6.88%15.01%-0.73%20.03%-12.38%22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CILGX and VIHAX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between CILGX and VIHAX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CILGX vs. VIHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CILGX
CILGX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VIHAX
VIHAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VIHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VIHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CILGX vs. VIHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Fund (CILGX) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CILGXVIHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.53

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

3.63

-2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.99

13.90

-11.91

CILGX vs. VIHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CILGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the VIHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CILGX and VIHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CILGX vs. VIHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CILGX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum VIHAX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CILGX and VIHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CILGXVIHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-38.80%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.30%

-9.53%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.60%

-12.29%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.37%

-23.92%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.47%

-0.62%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-5.94%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.57%

2.49%

+3.08%

Volatility

CILGX vs. VIHAX - Volatility Comparison

Clarkston Fund (CILGX) has a higher volatility of 9.54% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIHAX) at 3.46%. This indicates that CILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CILGXVIHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.54%

3.46%

+6.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.09%

10.28%

+4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

12.13%

+6.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

13.76%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

15.55%

+2.59%

CILGX vs. VIHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CILGX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VIHAX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

CILGX vs. VIHAX - Dividend Comparison

CILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than VIHAX's 3.45% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CILGX
Clarkston Fund
3.95%4.09%0.88%3.44%5.14%3.16%5.87%5.93%4.77%0.00%0.00%
VIHAX
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.45%3.69%4.85%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%5.63%4.28%3.16%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


CILGX and VIHAX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CILGX has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to VIHAX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CILGX dropped -33.57% vs VIHAX's -38.80%.

VIHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CILGX and VIHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer