CILGX vs. LEXCX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Clarkston Fund (CILGX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX).

CILGX is managed by Clarkston Funds. It was launched on Apr 1, 2016. LEXCX is managed by Voya. It was launched on Nov 18, 1935.

Performance

CILGX vs. LEXCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clarkston Fund (CILGX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CILGX vs. LEXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CILGX Clarkston Fund	-8.14%	8.29%	6.79%	17.86%	-8.60%	10.90%	16.93%	27.46%	-8.39%	9.33%
LEXCX Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund	15.27%	7.04%	3.60%	14.53%	3.95%	26.77%	4.36%	21.43%	-5.44%	16.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CILGX achieves a -8.14% return, which is significantly lower than LEXCX's 15.27% return.

CILGX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -8.43%
• YTD: -8.14%
• 6M: -3.58%
• 1Y: 1.25%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 2.72%
• 10Y*: —

LEXCX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 15.27%
• 6M: 11.64%
• 1Y: 14.00%
• 3Y*: 12.98%
• 5Y*: 11.85%
• 10Y*: 11.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CILGX vs. LEXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CILGX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LEXCX's 0.52% expense ratio.

CILGX

Clarkston Fund

LEXCX

Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund

Return for Risk

CILGX vs. LEXCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CILGX

CILGX Risk / Return Rank: 7
CILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

LEXCX

LEXCX Risk / Return Rank: 44
LEXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LEXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
LEXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LEXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
LEXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CILGX vs. LEXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Fund (CILGX) and Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CILGX	LEXCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	0.92	-0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	1.41	-1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.19	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	1.07	-1.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.13	3.63	-3.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CILGX vs. LEXCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CILGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the LEXCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CILGX and LEXCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CILGX	LEXCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	0.92	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.74	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.53	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between CILGX and LEXCX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CILGX vs. LEXCX - Dividend Comparison

CILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than LEXCX's 1.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CILGX Clarkston Fund	4.46%	4.09%	0.88%	3.44%	5.14%	3.16%	5.87%	5.93%	4.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LEXCX Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund	1.43%	1.65%	1.66%	1.58%	1.65%	1.54%	1.91%	1.86%	2.03%	1.79%	3.93%	2.37%

Drawdowns

CILGX vs. LEXCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CILGX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, smaller than the maximum LEXCX drawdown of -50.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CILGX and LEXCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CILGX	LEXCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.57%	-50.42%	+16.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.06%	-12.78%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.09%	-19.75%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.34%	-0.86%	-10.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-7.14%	+1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	3.76%	+0.08%

Volatility

CILGX vs. LEXCX - Volatility Comparison

Clarkston Fund (CILGX) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Voya Corporate Leaders Trust Fund (LEXCX) at 3.34%. This indicates that CILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CILGX	LEXCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	3.34%	+0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.03%	9.44%	+1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.45%	17.75%	+0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.65%	16.39%	+0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	18.90%	-0.94%