CILGX vs. SHXPX
CILGX (Clarkston Fund) and SHXPX (American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CILGX charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for SHXPX.
Performance
CILGX vs. SHXPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CILGX
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- -6.09%
- 6M
- -5.00%
- 1Y
- 2.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- —
SHXPX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CILGX vs. SHXPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CILGX Clarkston Fund | -0.26% |
SHXPX American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CILGX and SHXPX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CILGX vs. SHXPX — Risk / Return Rank
CILGX
SHXPX
CILGX vs. SHXPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Fund (CILGX) and American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund (SHXPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CILGX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CILGX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 23.86 | -23.45 |
Drawdowns
CILGX vs. SHXPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CILGX drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than SHXPX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CILGX and SHXPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CILGX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | 0.00% | -33.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.36% | 0.00% | -9.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | 0.00% | -5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | — | — |
Volatility
CILGX vs. SHXPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CILGX | SHXPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.43% | 2.38% | +13.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 2.38% | +14.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 2.38% | +15.56% |
CILGX vs. SHXPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CILGX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SHXPX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
CILGX vs. SHXPX - Dividend Comparison
CILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while SHXPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CILGX Clarkston Fund | 4.36% | 4.09% | 0.88% | 3.44% | 5.14% | 3.16% | 5.87% | 5.93% | 4.77% |
SHXPX American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, CILGX and SHXPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for CILGX and SHXPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer